
Occupancy sensors come in two main types: wireless sensors that run on batteries and wired sensors that get power and data through a single network cable, known as Power over Ethernet (PoE). If you’re planning to install sensors in your office, choosing between the two is one of the most important decisions you’ll make because the type you choose shapes everything that follows, including:
This article compares the two options to help you make the right choice for your building.
A wireless occupancy sensor runs on batteries and sends occupancy data over a radio protocol such as LoRaWAN, Zigbee, Bluetooth, or a proprietary network. A gateway inside the building collects the signals and forwards them to the cloud. Common types include under-desk sensors that detect whether a desk is in use and ceiling-mounted wireless people counters that count how many people are in a room or zone.
The main appeal is speed of installation. Because these sensors don’t require cabling, you can install them under a desk or on a ceiling pretty fast. This makes them popular in office buildings where new cabling is costly or prohibited.
However, there are trade-offs. To save battery, most wireless sensors send data at intervals rather than in real time. And with hundreds of devices on a radio network, signal range and interference can affect reliability.
A PoE occupancy sensor is both powered and connected through a single Ethernet cable, using the same Power over Ethernet technology that powers Wi-Fi access points and other office equipment. That cable plugs into a PoE-enabled network switch, which keeps the sensor powered and online at all times.
That constant power is the key advantage. It lets PoE occupancy sensors send data within seconds, providing real-time occupancy counts for floors, desks, and meeting rooms. It also allows more advanced processing on the sensor itself. Instead of simply detecting whether a single desk is in use, one ceiling-mounted PoE sensor can count how many people are in an entire area and where they are, so you get more detailed data from fewer devices.
The main trade-off is installation. Because each sensor needs its own network cable, PoE sensors require more planning than wireless ones. In new buildings with network cabling already in the ceiling, though, installation is usually straightforward.
PoE occupancy sensors have several advantages over battery-powered ones:
Real-time data matters most when it drives action, not just reports. Connected to your building systems, real-time occupancy counts enable you to:
Over time, the same data also helps you right-size your space by showing which floors, meeting rooms, and desks are consistently underused.
The case for acting on this data is growing. According to the British Council for Offices, UK offices average around 30% occupancy across the working week and about 40% from Tuesday to Thursday, yet most are still heated, lit, and cleaned as if they were full. The International Energy Agency estimates that operating buildings accounts for around 30% of global final energy consumption, and the UK government now intends that from 2031, privately rented commercial buildings over 1,000 m² in England and Wales must reach an EPC B rating where cost-effective, subject to legislation passing.
The savings can also be significant. The University of Wales Trinity Saint David cut its electricity and gas costs by 35%, supported by building closures based on Ubiqisense occupancy data and changing tariffs.
If you reconfigure a floor or start with a single area as a proof of concept, wireless sensors can be a good option.
Wired PoE sensors scale differently. Once the cabling is in place, adding a sensor only requires a free port on your network switch. And because one ceiling-mounted people counter can often cover the same area as several wireless sensors, you'll need fewer devices per floor.
Modern wireless protocols are reliable, and occupancy data needs very little bandwidth. Range and interference still matter, though: thick walls, glass, lift shafts, and metal fittings can weaken signals, so gateway placement needs careful planning.
A wired connection removes those variables and sends data continuously. Because PoE sensors sit on your corporate network, agree on network segmentation, firmware updates, and access controls with your IT team before rollout.
Whichever setup you choose, privacy should be an essential part of the decision.
Look for sensors that process data on the device itself and send anonymous occupancy counts. Also, check where the provider stores the data and how they protect it.
Certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2, along with GDPR compliance, signal that a vendor takes security very seriously.
Wireless can make sense for a short pilot or a building that cannot be cabled. These five questions will help you decide, and for most organisations measuring over the long term, they point to PoE.
Why choose PoE over wireless occupancy sensors?
PoE sensors need no batteries, send data continuously, count people more accurately, and run on a stable wired connection your IT team already manages. Over the life of a deployment, they are usually more reliable and cheaper to run.
Are wireless occupancy sensors reliable?
Yes, for certain use cases. Reliability depends on radio range, building materials, and how many devices share the network, so a site survey before rollout is worth doing.
How long do occupancy sensor batteries last?
It varies by model and reporting frequency. Many vendors quote several years, but more frequent reporting shortens battery life.
Does a PoE occupancy sensor need a separate power supply?
No. It draws power from a PoE-enabled network switch through the same Ethernet cable that carries its data.
Can I combine wireless and PoE sensors?
Yes. Some organisations use PoE people counters for meeting rooms and larger areas and wireless sensors where cabling isn’t possible.
Wireless occupancy sensors have their place, mainly for quick pilots and buildings where cabling is not possible. For organisations that want dependable, real-time occupancy data over years rather than months, wired PoE sensors are the stronger choice: no batteries to replace, more accurate people counting, a stable connection, and lower long-term costs.
If you are planning occupancy sensing across one or more offices, a good first step is checking your existing ceiling cabling and PoE switch capacity.
Ubiqisense combines intelligent workplace occupancy sensors with a cloud-based analytics dashboard, giving you real-time and historical insight into how floors, meeting rooms, shared spaces, and desks are used.
Find out how your office is really used.