
Occupancy sensors are physical devices that detect whether people are present in a space, and often how many (people counting). Depending on the technology, occupancy sensors can:
Integrate with building systems to:
Measure how space is used:
Support daily operations:
Occupancy sensors use different technologies to detect people, but the process usually involves these four steps:
You can find a wide range of occupancy sensors on the market today. This article covers ten common types: AI vision (DNN-based), passive infrared (PIR), ultrasonic, dual-technology, microwave, radar, thermal, time-of-flight (ToF), under-desk, and CO2 sensors. Each detects a different signal and has its own strengths and limitations. The table below gives a quick overview, and the sections that follow cover each type in detail.
AI vision sensors use an optical sensor and a neural network to recognise people in a space. They can count how many people are in a room and show exactly which desks and spaces are in use.
Strengths: They provide the most granular occupancy data and high accuracy.
Limitations: They need adequate lighting and a clear view of the monitored space. Privacy depends entirely on the design.
Cost: The cost per sensor is higher than PIR or radar. However, one sensor can cover an area that would otherwise need multiple desk-level devices.
Best for: Granular space utilisation data across desks, meeting rooms, and shared areas, where the data will inform real estate decisions and layout changes.
Ubiqisense sensors belong to this category. Because all data is anonymised on the device, no images are stored or transmitted, so they can be used even in meeting rooms and other private spaces. See how Ubiqisense occupancy sensors work.
PIR sensors detect changes in infrared radiation, the heat people give off, as someone moves through the sensor’s field of view. A segmented lens divides the area into zones, and the sensor triggers when a warm body moves from one zone to the next.
Strengths: They’re inexpensive, use very little power (so they work well on batteries), are easy to install, and collect no personal data.
Limitations: They detect movement, not presence. They’re good at noticing someone walking into a room but often miss small movements like typing, so lights can switch off while people are still working. They also need a clear line of sight, can’t see past partitions, and can’t count people or show where they are. Heat sources can also cause false triggers.
Cost: Basic PIR detectors for lighting control are inexpensive. One UK supplier lists Steinel motion detectors at £17.99–£42.14.
Best for: Corridors, stairwells, storerooms, and small rooms where people are usually moving. They’re not suitable for measuring desk or meeting room use.
Ultrasonic sensors emit high-frequency sound waves, well above the range of human hearing, and detect changes in the reflected waves caused by movement. Because sound fills the room and reflects around obstacles, they don’t need a direct line of sight.
Strengths: They’re sensitive to small movements like typing or turning pages, and work around partitions.
Limitations: Air movement from ventilation systems can cause false triggers. Because they constantly emit a signal, they use more power than PIR and are usually hard-wired. They also can’t count people or show where they are.
Cost: Usually more expensive than PIR sensors.
Best for: Lighting control in restrooms, partitioned offices, and other spaces where obstacles block a PIR sensor’s view.
Dual-technology sensors combine PIR with ultrasonic sensing. In many products, both technologies must detect someone before the lights switch on, which reduces false triggers from air movement or people passing in a corridor.
Strengths: Fewer false triggers than single-technology sensors, and better coverage in rooms with partitions or furniture.
Limitations: Requiring both technologies to agree can make lights more likely to switch off while the room is still in use. They also can’t count people.
Cost: More than single-technology sensors.
Best for: Meeting rooms, classrooms, and spaces where lights switching off while people are present is an issue.
Microwave sensors emit low-power microwave signals and detect changes in the reflections as people move. They’re often built into light fittings, especially in commercial and industrial lighting.
Strengths: They’re very sensitive and have a long detection range. They can also detect presence through certain non-metallic materials, such as glass and thin partitions.
Limitations: Because they can see through some materials, they can pick up movement outside the intended area, such as people in a corridor or the next room, so range settings need careful adjustment. They detect motion rather than presence and can’t count people.
Cost: Comparable to PIR for basic lighting sensors.
Best for: Warehouses, car parks, corridors, and large open areas, especially where the sensor sits inside a light fitting.
Radar presence sensors work on the same principle as microwave sensors, but at higher frequencies and with more advanced signal processing. They can detect very small movements, including breathing, so they can tell a room is occupied even when people are sitting completely still. Some can also locate and count a small number of people.
Strengths: They reliably detect people who aren’t moving, which solves PIR’s biggest weakness. They work in the dark and can be hidden behind ceiling tiles or panels.
Limitations: Counting accuracy drops as rooms get busier. Like microwave sensors, they can detect through some materials, so placement matters.
Cost: Wide range. Basic presence sensors are inexpensive, but commercial sensors with counting and integrations cost considerably more.
Best for: Desks, small meeting rooms, focus rooms, and other spaces where people sit still for long periods.
Thermal sensors use an array of heat-sensing elements to create a low-resolution heat map of a space. People show up as warm spots, whether they’re moving or not. The resolution is far too low to identify anyone.
Strengths: They detect people who sit still and can count them without capturing identifiable images, and they work in low light.
Limitations: Their low resolution limits how much detail they provide. Heat sources such as radiators, laptops and direct sunlight can interfere, and people standing close together can affect accuracy.
Cost: They usually cost more than PIR sensors, but less than AI vision sensors.
Best for: Room-level counting in privacy-sensitive spaces, such as meeting rooms and healthcare settings.
Time-of-flight sensors emit pulses of infrared light and measure how long they take to bounce back, building a 3D depth map of the area below. Mounted above a doorway, they count people entering and leaving and can tell which direction they’re going.
Strengths: Accurate counting at entrances and between zones.
Limitations: Reflective surfaces and strong sunlight can affect readings, and mounting height is limited. Because they count crossings rather than presence, a missed entry or exit can throw the count off until the sensor resets.
Cost: Mid- to high-range per entrance.
Best for: Footfall at building entrances, floor-level occupancy, and tracking against capacity.
Under-desk sensors are small, usually battery-powered devices fixed under individual desks. They typically use PIR or thermal sensing to detect whether someone is sitting there.
Strengths: Simple, accurate yes/no data for each desk, and easy to install.
Limitations: You need one sensor per desk, so costs and battery maintenance grow with your estate. They only cover desks, not meeting rooms or shared areas, and they can be knocked or moved when furniture is rearranged.
Cost: Moderate per unit. One UK reseller lists an EnOcean under-desk sensor at £75, but the total depends on how many desks you have.
Best for: Hot-desking and desk-booking systems in smaller estates, or pilots before a wider rollout.
CO2 sensors don’t detect people directly. They estimate occupancy from the build-up of carbon dioxide people exhale. Many buildings already have them for ventilation and indoor air quality.
Strengths: They may already be installed, and they’re useful for adjusting ventilation to match how many people are in a room.
Limitations: CO2 levels take time to build up and fall, so they lag behind real occupancy. The UK Health and Safety Executive describes CO2 readings as only a broad guide to ventilation. Readings also shift when people open windows or doors.
Cost: Low to moderate, and often already in place.
Best for: Ventilation control and rough occupancy trends, not desk- or room-level utilisation data.
Some organisations estimate occupancy from data they already have:
These sources are a useful starting point, but they can’t replace sensors for reliable space utilisation data.
Occupancy sensors offer four main advantages: lower energy use, better space allocation, data-driven real estate investments, and improved employee satisfaction.
Occupancy sensors enable building systems to automatically switch off lights in empty rooms and adjust HVAC based on actual occupancy. This means that less energy goes to heating, cooling, and lighting unused spaces. According to the Carbon Trust, installing lighting and occupancy sensors can cut lighting costs by around 20% a year, and lighting controls alone can reduce electricity use by 30–50% in a typical office.
Most offices have far more space than they use. On an average weekday, only about 3 in 10 desks in UK offices are occupied, and even on the busiest days, Tuesday to Thursday, it’s just 4 in 10, according to the British Council for Offices (BCO). By identifying underused and high-demand areas, as well as usage throughout the week, occupancy sensors allow you to reallocate desks, free up meeting rooms, and rework layouts.
Unused space is expensive. Including rent, rates, service charges, and energy, a single workstation in Mayfair now costs over £21,000 a year. Even in the UK’s major regional cities, it’s only around 40% cheaper. Hybrid work has also changed how offices are used, and the BCO now expects desks to be occupied 66% of the time, down from 80%. Tracking occupancy over time shows whether you need more space or just a better layout.
For example, if certain office areas are barely used while others are always occupied, you can rearrange workstations before committing to an expensive expansion.
According to the World Green Building Council, office design, including layout, air quality, and lighting, affects employees’ wellbeing and productivity. However, a good layout isn’t just about looks. It’s also about whether people can find a desk or meeting room when they need one. Real-time availability data lets employees see what’s free before they arrive. Less time searching for space means less frustration and more time for actual work.
Occupancy sensors can benefit a wide range of organisations, such as:
By measuring how desks, meeting rooms, and shared areas are used throughout the week, occupancy sensors help you:
Occupancy data helps higher education institutions:
Occupancy data helps government offices, libraries, museums, and other public buildings:
Hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes must meet strict standards for privacy, reliability, and safety. Within those limits, occupancy data helps you:
In retail environments, occupancy data enables you to:
With so many occupancy sensors on the market, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. The good news is that following these six steps can make the choice much simpler.
Start by defining your goal. Do you want to reduce energy consumption, optimise existing space, or inform real estate investments?
Each goal calls for a different level of detection and data quality.
Consider the room’s dimensions and layout, including entrances, partitions, furniture, and lighting. A sensor that suits a small meeting room may not work as well for a large open-space office.
How accurate your sensor needs to be depends on your end goal. A light switching off while someone’s still in the room is annoying, but inaccurate data can lead to costly mistakes when deciding whether you need a bigger office or just a better use of the space you have.
Ask suppliers how accurate their occupancy sensors are, and under what conditions:
Find out what the system collects. Is it images, thermal data, device identifiers, location data, or only anonymous occupancy counts?
Then ask:
This is especially important for companies that are subject to strict data protection rules, such as the GDPR.
Make sure the sensor can talk to the systems that will use its data. Consider:
The sensor price is only part of the total cost. For the full picture, factor in installation, connectivity, gateways, software licences, integration, and maintenance. Then weigh the total against the expected benefits.
It depends on what the sensor collects. Sensors that anonymise data on the device and never create, send, or store personal data are GDPR-compliant. On the other hand, systems that record images or track devices process personal data, so they need a lawful basis and extra safeguards under the GDPR.
Accuracy varies widely by technology. Basic PIR sensors often miss people sitting still and can’t count. AI vision sensors can count people accurately at desk and room level, and time-of-flight sensors count people accurately at entrances. Ubiqisense sensors, for example, reach more than 99% occupancy accuracy over time. When comparing suppliers, ask what the accuracy figure measures and how it was tested.
These terms are often used interchangeably, but they describe different things:
Some can. PIR sensors detect movement, so they often miss people sitting quietly at a desk. Radar, thermal, and AI vision sensors can detect people who aren’t moving, making them better suited for measuring how desks and meeting rooms are used.
Occupancy sensing measures whether a space is in use, and often how many people are in it. People counting, also called footfall counting, tracks how many people enter and leave through an entrance. Many organisations use both: occupancy data for desks and rooms, and footfall data for buildings and floors.
It depends on what you need the sensor to do. Basic sensors for lighting control are inexpensive: one UK supplier lists Steinel motion detectors at £17.99–£42.14, and an EnOcean under-desk sensor sells for £75. Sensors for space analytics usually cost more and often come with a software subscription. The sensor price is only part of the total, so factor in installation, connectivity, software, integration, and maintenance.
Ubiqisense sensors show how many people use each desk, room, and floor, and when, with occupancy data updated every 20 seconds. Over time, they reach more than 99% occupancy accuracy. They can also tell whether people are sitting or standing, and they calibrate themselves within a few days of installation.
In the Ubiqisense platform, heatmaps show where people spend their time, so you can quickly spot busy and underused areas. The data also connects to the systems you already use, from your building systems to Power BI.
Because all data is anonymised on the device, you can use Ubiqisense sensors even in meeting rooms and other private spaces. Ubiqisense is also ISO 27001 and SOC 2-certified, and GDPR-compliant.
Here’s what that looks like in practice.
When a tenant at Flintholm Company House in Copenhagen asked for more meeting rooms, Nordic real estate specialist DEAS didn’t add square metres. It started measuring how the existing rooms were used. The data told a different story: between 8 am and 4 pm, the meeting rooms were booked only 28% of the time, with an average of four or five people in rooms built for ten. Demand peaked on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and the rooms furthest from employees’ desks were barely used. The problem wasn’t a lack of space; it was how the existing space was set up.
As DEAS’s Lead Architect for Space Planning, Mie Møller, puts it: “We were surprised by the data.” Read the full DEAS story.
A large UK university with a multi-site estate installed Ubiqisense sensors to understand how its teaching spaces were really used. The data showed teaching-room utilisation of just 7 to 12% in rooms the booking system showed as busy. With that evidence, the university closed 28 buildings, cutting its electricity and gas costs by 35%. It now also uses the same data for its ESG reporting and funding bids.
Choosing an occupancy sensor depends on what you need the data for. If you only want lights to switch off in empty rooms, a basic sensor will do. But if you’re deciding whether to expand, consolidate, or redesign your workplace, you need data you can trust.
Here’s where accurate, anonymous occupancy data makes the difference. It replaces assumptions with evidence, so you can invest in the space you actually need and stop paying for the space you don’t.
Want to see how your building is really being used? Book a demo, and we’ll show you what your space could look like with Ubiqisense.